Skip to main content
Paper overview

Theoretical Contributions

Table 8 summarizes the contributions. The first contribution is a construct contribution: OKK names governed knowledge continuity under AI-native representational plurality. The second is a boundary contribution: the paper distinguishes knowledge, memory, state, projection, evidence, authority, and correspondence from adjacent technical and organizational constructs. The third is a mechanism contribution: the paper identifies identity anchoring, governed admission, provenance binding, authority qualification, projection grounding, correspondence checking, decision-execution linkage, evidence feedback, learning revision, contestation, and AI reliance calibration as mechanisms through which knowledge continuity is preserved.

Table 8. Theoretical Contributions

ContributionTarget LiteratureIncremental Value
ConstructOrganizational knowledge, memory, IS theoryDefines OKK as governed knowledge continuity under AI-native projection.
BoundaryKMS, knowledge graphs, digital twins, systems of recordSeparates technical representation from organizational legitimacy.
MechanismGovernance, provenance, learning, correspondenceExplains how authority, evidence, projection, and revision preserve meaning.